SayPro Risk Analysis Completion

Complete risk assessments for all bids, identifying at least 3 key risks per proposal

Quarterly Objective: Risk Assessment Completion

Total Number of Bids to Complete Risk Assessments For:

• Target: Complete risk assessments for all bids received, identifying at least 3 key risks per proposal.

Purpose:
The purpose of the risk assessment process is to systematically identify potential risks associated with each bid proposal, enabling SayPro to make informed decisions, mitigate threats, and ensure the successful execution of projects. This will also help in improving overall risk management by identifying issues early in the evaluation phase.

---

Monthly Milestone – January

Document Reference: SCMR-1: SayPro Monthly Bid Evaluation

Key Activities Conducted in January:

• Total Bids Received: [Insert number if available – e.g., 7]
• Risk Assessments Completed: [Insert number – e.g., 5]
• Risk Review Teams: A team consisting of procurement managers, legal experts, financial analysts, and project managers conducted in-depth risk assessments.
• Key Risks Identified: Each bid underwent a comprehensive risk analysis, with a focus on financial, operational, legal, and environmental risks.

---

Risk Assessment Process Overview:

Each bid submitted for review is evaluated with the following risk assessment steps:

1. Identification of Key Risks:
   For each bid, at least three primary risks are identified across the following categories:
   • Financial Risks:
     • Budget overruns.
     • Misalignment between bid price and market conditions.
     • Unclear cost structures or hidden charges.
   • Operational Risks:
     • Inability of the supplier to meet delivery deadlines.
     • Lack of capacity or resources to deliver as proposed.
     • Potential for poor-quality output or failure to meet project specifications.
   • Legal and Compliance Risks:
     • Non-compliance with regulatory requirements or laws.
     • Potential legal disputes arising from contract terms.
     • Issues with intellectual property rights or licenses.
   • Environmental and Social Risks:
     • Supplier’s sustainability practices or environmental impact.
     • Social risks, such as workforce exploitation or unsafe working conditions.
     • Adverse effects on the local community or stakeholders.
2. Risk Mitigation Strategies:
   • For each identified risk, the risk assessment includes a suggested mitigation strategy or contingency plan. For example:
     • If a financial risk of budget overruns is identified, the assessment might recommend securing additional financial guarantees or ensuring that payment milestones are tied to performance checks.
     • If an operational risk is identified, such as late delivery, a mitigation strategy could involve setting up clear timelines with penalties for delay, or a third-party audit to verify the supplier’s capacity.
3. Risk Scoring and Prioritization:
   • Each risk is assigned a severity score (high, medium, low) and a likelihood score (high, medium, low).
   • The overall risk rating helps prioritize the most critical risks that need immediate attention, especially if the bid is progressing to the contract negotiation stage.
4. Documentation and Reporting:
   • Detailed risk assessment reports are generated for each bid, including a summary of risks, mitigation strategies, and a risk score.
   • These reports are submitted to senior management and the procurement oversight committee for further review and decision-making.

---

Quarterly Risk Assessment Goals (Q1):

• Target for the Quarter: Complete risk assessments for all bids reviewed during Q1, identifying at least 3 key risks per proposal.
• Reporting: Risk assessments will be integrated into the overall bid evaluation reports. A quarterly summary report will be provided at the end of March, highlighting the risk trends and key challenges identified.
• Timeline:
  • January: Complete initial risk assessments for bids received.
  • February: Ongoing risk assessments, focusing on identifying emerging risks and implementing mitigation strategies.
  • March: Final risk assessments for any outstanding bids, with comprehensive reporting for the quarter.

---

Next Steps:

• February: Review risk mitigation strategies in place for bids with high-severity risks.
• March: Finalize risk reports and ensure all identified risks are addressed through contractual safeguards or corrective actions.
• Training: Schedule a refresher course for the risk assessment team on advanced risk evaluation techniques by [Insert Date].