Conduct a thorough review of all received bids for tenders, proposals, and quotations
π Objective:
To ensure a fair, transparent, and methodical assessment of all bids received in response to SayPro tenders, proposals, or quotations. This process is essential for identifying the most responsive, technically compliant, and cost-effective bid in alignment with SayProβs procurement policies and applicable regulations.
π§Ύ Document Title: Bid Submission Review Report
π Step-by-Step Review Process of Bid Submissions
The review of bids should be conducted in three main phases:
πΉ Phase 1: Receipt & Preliminary Verification
Purpose: Ensure that only compliant bids proceed to full evaluation.
Key Actions:
- Bid Opening Register:
- Log each bid received.
- Include: Date/time received, bidder name, bid reference number, format (physical/electronic), and person who received/opened it.
- Initial Compliance Screening:
- Check for:
- Submission before deadline
- Properly sealed and marked envelopes
- Signed and completed forms
- All mandatory documents included (e.g., tax clearance, company registration, B-BBEE certificate, etc.)
- Adherence to format and instructions
- Check for:
- Disqualification (if applicable):
- Record any non-compliant bids in the Bid Rejection Report
- Justify the reason for exclusion (e.g., late submission, unsigned documents)
πΉ Phase 2: Technical Evaluation
Purpose: Assess how well each bidder meets the technical and functional requirements.
Key Actions:
- Establish an Evaluation Committee:
- Minimum of 3 members with relevant expertise
- Must sign a Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Declaration
- Develop a Scorecard:
- Based on criteria in the RFP/RFQ/Tender
- Categories may include:
- Experience and track record
- Methodology and work plan
- Team qualifications
- Compliance with technical specifications
- Innovation or value-adds
- Scoring Process:
- Use agreed scoring matrix (e.g., 0-5 or 0-100 scale)
- Score independently, then meet to consolidate
- Record final technical scores for each bidder
- Minimum Threshold:
- Only bidders who meet the minimum technical threshold (e.g., 70%) proceed to financial evaluation
πΉ Phase 3: Financial Evaluation
Purpose: Compare pricing proposals of technically qualified bidders for value for money.
Key Actions:
- Open Financial Proposals:
Only for bidders who passed the technical stage - Assess the Following:
- Total price (including VAT)
- Cost breakdowns and pricing structure
- Reasonableness and market competitiveness
- Any conditional pricing or anomalies
- Apply Weighted Evaluation (if applicable):
- E.g., 80/20 or 90/10 scoring split between technical and financial components
- Price Normalization:
- Correct for errors or inconsistencies where necessary (e.g., arithmetic checks)
πΉ Summary Compilation
Each bidβs results should be summarized in a Bid Evaluation Summary Table that includes:
Bidder | Compliance (Y/N) | Technical Score (%) | Financial Score (%) | Final Score (%) | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company A | Yes | 82 | 78 | 80.4 | 1 |
Company B | Yes | 75 | 70 | 73.0 | 2 |
Company C | No (Non-compliant) | – | – | – | Rejected |
π Link to SayPro Monthly January SCMR-1: SayPro Monthly Bid Evaluation
For the January SCMR-1 Report:
- Each bid opportunity evaluated must include a Bid Submission Review
- Reference numbers of bids, list of bidders, compliance status, technical and financial scores must be included in the SCMR-1 file
- Supporting documents (evaluation matrices, scoring sheets, compliance checklists) must be attached
- Final ranking must correspond with the Award Decision Memo
ποΈ Timeline and Submission Requirements
- Bid Review should be completed within 5β7 working days from the bid closing date
- All completed reviews must be submitted as supporting documentation with the SCMR-1 Report by February 5, 2025
β Compliance Checklist for Bid Reviews
Item | Description | Completed (βοΈ/β) |
---|---|---|
Bid Opening Register | Logged and signed | βοΈ |
Preliminary Compliance Checklist | Submitted | βοΈ |
Technical Evaluation Scores | Consolidated and signed | βοΈ |
Financial Comparison Table | Completed | βοΈ |
Final Ranking | Confirmed and documented | βοΈ |
π Optional Attachments
- Evaluation Scorecards
- Bid Comparison Sheet
- Evaluator Declarations
- Meeting Minutes (Evaluation Committee)
- Signed Copy of Tender Document (by winning bidder)
Leave a Reply