Send clear and constructive feedback to bidders who were not selected, helping them improve for future tenders
📌 Objective:
To deliver clear, constructive, and transparent feedback to unsuccessful bidders. The goal is to help them understand the reasons behind their non-selection, highlight areas for improvement, and maintain a professional relationship that encourages their future participation in SayPro’s tendering process.
Feedback is a crucial component of SayPro’s procurement process, ensuring that unsuccessful bidders are not left in the dark about the outcome and have an opportunity to improve their proposals for future tenders.
📝 Key Elements of Providing Feedback to Unsuccessful Bidders
- Transparency
- Ensure that the feedback is transparent, highlighting the evaluation criteria used and the specific reasons why the bidder’s proposal was not successful.
- Avoid general or vague statements, such as “the proposal did not meet our needs.” Provide specific, actionable feedback on areas where the bid fell short.
- Constructive Criticism
- Feedback should focus on improvement. The aim is to provide the bidder with insights that they can use to enhance their future submissions.
- Frame the feedback in a positive, constructive manner, even if the bidder’s proposal had significant weaknesses. Offering suggestions for improvement helps to maintain a positive relationship with the bidder.
- Respectful and Professional Tone
- Ensure that the feedback is communicated with respect and professionalism. The purpose is not to criticize but to guide the bidder towards better alignment with SayPro’s requirements in future bids.
- Acknowledge the effort and time the bidder invested in preparing the proposal.
- Timeliness
- Feedback should be provided promptly, ideally within 3–5 business days after the winning bidder has been notified. This ensures that the unsuccessful bidder is not left waiting for an extended period and can act on the feedback in a timely manner.
🏢 How to Provide Feedback to Unsuccessful Bidders
1. Prepare the Feedback Document
A well-structured feedback document should be prepared, addressing the main points of evaluation and detailing where the bidder’s submission did not meet the required criteria.
Sections to Include in the Feedback:
- Introduction
- Thank the bidder for their participation and acknowledge the effort they invested in preparing the proposal.
- Briefly explain the purpose of the feedback (i.e., to help them understand why their bid was not successful and to encourage their future participation).
Thank you for your submission for [Project Name]. We appreciate the time and effort your team put into the proposal. After thorough evaluation, we regret to inform you that your bid was not selected. Please find below the feedback on your submission to help guide your future proposals.” - Overview of Evaluation Criteria
- Provide a brief overview of the evaluation criteria used to assess all bids. This section will help the bidder understand the context of the feedback and how their bid was evaluated against the specific requirements.
- Technical Capability
- Financial Competitiveness
- Experience and Past Performance
- Project Timeline and Delivery
- Compliance with Specifications and Requirements“
- Specific Feedback on Each Criterion
- For each evaluation criterion, provide specific feedback on where the bidder’s submission fell short. Identify areas for improvement, and where applicable, provide suggestions for how the bidder can enhance their proposal in future bids.
- Technical Capability: “While your technical approach demonstrated a solid understanding of the project requirements, there were concerns regarding your proposed methodology for risk management. Specifically, your plan did not include detailed contingency measures for addressing potential delays. We recommend that you incorporate more comprehensive risk mitigation strategies and clearly outline contingency plans in future submissions.”
- Financial Competitiveness: “Your pricing was higher than that of the winning bidder. This is partly due to the premium you included for certain high-cost resources. In future tenders, consider reviewing your cost structure to align with industry standards and ensure that your bid is competitive while still reflecting the quality and value of your service.”
- Experience and Past Performance: “Your proposal highlighted some relevant experience; however, it lacked detailed case studies or examples of similar projects completed within the last two years. We encourage you to include more recent project examples and provide clear references to demonstrate your ability to deliver on similar projects.”
- Project Timeline and Delivery: “The timeline proposed was overly ambitious given the complexity of the project. We recommend that you review the project phases and adjust the schedule to allow for realistic delivery milestones. More attention to the detailed planning of each phase would help ensure the feasibility of your timeline.”
- Compliance with Specifications: “Your proposal did not fully address some of the critical project specifications outlined in the tender, particularly in the areas of quality assurance and regulatory compliance. Future submissions should ensure that all requirements are addressed thoroughly, and any deviations from the specifications are clearly explained and justified.”
- Encouragement and Invitation for Future Bids
- End the feedback by encouraging the bidder to participate in future tenders. Make it clear that the feedback is intended to help them improve and that SayPro values their continued involvement in future opportunities.
- Point of Contact for Further Clarification
- Provide a point of contact (usually from the procurement team) for any follow-up questions or requests for further clarification. This shows openness and a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue.
2. Delivery of Feedback to Unsuccessful Bidders
The feedback document should be sent as a formal communication, either in the form of a detailed letter or email. Ensure that the message is polite, professional, and structured.
Method of Delivery:
- Email or Postal Mail: Depending on the preference of the bidder and the importance of the project, feedback can be provided via email (for quicker responses) or postal mail (for more formal communications).
- Optional Follow-Up Call or Meeting: In some cases, an additional follow-up call or meeting may be scheduled if the bidder requests further discussion. This can be an opportunity to elaborate on the feedback and answer any questions the bidder may have.
Example of Email Format for Feedback:
Subject: Feedback on [Project Name] Bid Submission
Dear [Bidder Name],
Thank you for your submission for [Project Name]. After a comprehensive evaluation of all bids, we regret to inform you that your proposal was not selected. We understand that this news may be disappointing, and we want to take this opportunity to provide detailed feedback to help you in future tendering processes.
Please find the evaluation feedback below, which includes a breakdown of the strengths and areas for improvement in your submission.
[Insert detailed feedback for each criterion here.]
We value your participation in this tender process and encourage you to submit proposals for future opportunities with SayPro. If you would like to discuss the feedback further or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at [Contact Information].
Thank you once again for your effort and we look forward to the possibility of working with you in the future.
Best regards,
[Your Name]
[Your Position]
SayPro Procurement Team
[Contact Information]
📅 Timeline for Providing Feedback
- Feedback to Unsuccessful Bidders: Should be provided within 3–5 business days of notifying the winning bidder.
- Debriefing Meetings (if requested): Can be scheduled within 7–10 business days after the initial feedback is sent.
💡 Best Practices for Providing Feedback
- Be Specific: Avoid generic feedback and instead focus on clear, actionable suggestions for improvement.
- Maintain Professionalism: Regardless of the reason for non-selection, always communicate with respect, ensuring that the bidder feels valued and encouraged to participate in future opportunities.
- Consistency: Provide similar levels of feedback for all bidders to ensure fairness and transparency throughout the evaluation process.
Leave a Reply