Document the evaluation process and provide a detailed report on the selected bid, including the reasoning behind the decision and the anticipated outcomes
Project Reference: SayPro Monthly January SCMR-1
Report Title: Evaluation Report on Bid Selection
Date: January 31, 2025
Prepared by: SayPro Supply Chain Management & Procurement Unit
1. Introduction
This report documents the evaluation process and final decision made regarding the SayPro Monthly January SCMR-1 Bid Evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation was to identify the most suitable and capable vendor(s) to fulfill the procurement needs of SayPro in line with our quality, cost-efficiency, timeliness, and compliance standards.
2. Evaluation Committee
The evaluation was conducted by a designated Bid Evaluation Committee (BEC) comprising the following members:
- Procurement Lead (Chairperson)
- Technical Expert (Engineering & Specifications)
- Finance Representative
- Compliance Officer
- Project Implementation Coordinator
3. Bid Solicitation Overview
- RFP Issued: January 2, 2025
- Bid Submission Deadline: January 15, 2025
- Number of Bids Received: 6
- Scope: Supply and installation of digital monitoring equipment and training for SayPro regional offices across 4 provinces.
4. Evaluation Criteria
Bids were assessed using a weighted scorecard based on the following criteria:
| Criterion | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Technical Compliance | 30% |
| Financial Proposal | 25% |
| Delivery & Implementation | 15% |
| Past Performance | 10% |
| Capacity & Resources | 10% |
| Legal & Regulatory Compliance | 10% |
5. Evaluation Process
Each bid was reviewed individually and scored against the established criteria. Technical and financial proposals were evaluated separately in compliance with SayPro’s procurement policy.
- Step 1: Preliminary Screening
Verified documentation completeness, eligibility criteria, and compliance with submission instructions. - Step 2: Technical Evaluation
Assessed the proposed methodology, approach, quality of equipment, and capacity for training and implementation. - Step 3: Financial Evaluation
Cost proposals were reviewed after technical scoring. Only technically compliant bids were considered. - Step 4: Risk Assessment
Conducted a brief risk review focusing on feasibility, budgetary concerns, and resource availability. - Step 5: Final Deliberation
Aggregated scores and selected the top vendor based on overall performance.
6. Bidder Comparison Summary
| Bidder | Technical Score (30%) | Financial Score (25%) | Delivery Score (15%) | Total Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor A | 26 | 22 | 13 | 81% | Selected |
| Vendor B | 24 | 20 | 11 | 75% | Runner-up |
| Vendor C | 18 | 23 | 9 | 68% | Disqualified (low technical) |
| Vendor D | 25 | 17 | 14 | 73% | Considered but not selected |
| Vendor E | 22 | 21 | 12 | 72% | Considered |
| Vendor F | 20 | 18 | 10 | 65% | Disqualified |
7. Selected Bid: Vendor A
Rationale for Selection
- Technical Excellence: Vendor A proposed the most comprehensive technical solution, with detailed product specifications that exceeded minimum requirements. Their solution includes real-time data analytics and secure cloud backups.
- Cost Efficiency: Vendor A’s proposal offered strong value for money while staying within budget. Although not the lowest bid, their price justified the superior technical offering.
- Delivery Capacity: Vendor A committed to a 6-week delivery and installation schedule, supported by a proven implementation framework and dedicated project team.
- Past Performance: Positive references from three past SayPro projects, delivered on time and within budget.
- Regulatory Compliance: All certifications, tax clearance, and local content requirements were fully met.
8. Anticipated Outcomes
Short-Term (0–3 Months)
- Timely installation and commissioning of equipment at 4 regional offices.
- Training of 32 staff members on digital system use and reporting.
- Improved operational visibility and data reliability.
Medium-Term (3–6 Months)
- Enhanced decision-making through access to real-time analytics.
- Reduced manual errors and streamlined monitoring processes.
- Cost savings through efficient resource allocation based on data insights.
Long-Term (6–12 Months)
- Standardization of data collection across SayPro operations.
- Strengthened accountability and audit trail for donor and internal reporting.
- Improved service delivery and stakeholder satisfaction.
9. Recommendations
- Proceed to contract negotiation with Vendor A, with emphasis on delivery timelines and performance guarantees.
- Establish a monitoring team to oversee implementation and resolve any early-stage technical issues.
- Document lessons learned to refine future bid evaluations.
10. Annexures
- Annex 1: Full Bidder Scorecards
- Annex 2: Technical Proposal Summary – Vendor A
- Annex 3: Financial Analysis Table
- Annex 4: Risk Assessment Matrix
- Annex 5: Evaluation Committee Declarations
Approved by:
Name: [Procurement Lead Name]
Title: Procurement Lead, SayPro SCM Unit
Date: January 31, 2025
Signature: ____________________
Leave a Reply