SayPro Feedback Report Template

Templates to Use: A template for documenting post-submission feedback and lessons learned

Report Title: Feedback Report for SayPro Monthly January SCMR-1 & SayPro Quarterly Project Proposal and Tender Support
Project Name/ID:
(Insert the project name or unique project ID)
Submission Date:
(Insert the submission date of the proposal/tender)
Report Date:
(Insert the date when the feedback report is being created)
Prepared By:
(Name of the individual/team compiling the report)
Reviewed By:
(Names of the individuals or departments that reviewed the report)

Objective of the Submission:
(Briefly describe the objective of the proposal or tender submission, including the project goals, deliverables, and expected outcomes.)
Submission Overview:
(Summarize the nature of the proposal, including the client or organization it was submitted to, the scope of work, and the key components included in the submission.)
Outcome of the Submission:
(State the outcome of the submission, whether it was accepted, rejected, or is still pending. If rejected, provide the reason given by the client or evaluation committee, if applicable.)

A. Feedback from Client or Tender Committee:

Feedback Highlights: (Provide a summary of the main feedback points received from the client or the tender committee. This could include comments on the overall proposal quality, content, compliance, or specific sections of the submission.)
Positive Feedback: (Outline any aspects of the proposal that were positively received. This could include project approach, methodology, team qualifications, risk management strategies, pricing, or innovation.)
Areas for Improvement: (Identify the aspects of the submission that were highlighted as needing improvement. This may include areas like proposal clarity, competitive pricing, completeness of documentation, compliance with client requirements, or timeliness of submission.)
Specific Criticisms: (Provide any direct criticisms or feedback points that were provided. This may include errors or weaknesses that need immediate attention, such as gaps in the tender response or overlooked requirements.)

B. Internal Team Feedback:

Team’s Perspective on Submission Process: (Summarize internal team feedback on how the submission process was handled. Was the process efficient? Were there any roadblocks or delays in gathering information or preparing the proposal?)
Challenges Faced by the Team: (Document any internal challenges encountered during the proposal preparation, such as resource constraints, insufficient data, lack of clarity in requirements, or issues with team coordination.)
Successes and Strengths: (Highlight internal successes or strengths during the preparation of the submission. This might include effective collaboration, timely completion, or high-quality deliverables.)

A. Proposal/Submission Process:

What Went Well: (Document the processes or strategies that worked well during the submission. This might include the use of templates, a clear division of responsibilities, or effective internal communication.)
What Could Be Improved: (Identify any steps in the proposal process that could be improved. This may include better time management, more thorough review processes, or improved data collection and analysis.)
Resource and Support Needs: (Outline any resource or support needs identified during the process, such as additional tools, better project management systems, or more personnel to handle specific tasks.)

B. Proposal Content:

Content Strengths: (Highlight the aspects of the proposal content that were particularly effective, such as clarity of messaging, quality of the technical approach, or the persuasiveness of the value proposition.)
Content Gaps: (Document any gaps or weaknesses in the content of the proposal, such as missing details, areas where the proposal did not fully align with client needs, or technical details that required further elaboration.)
Compliance with Requirements: (Note any challenges in ensuring the proposal fully complied with the tender requirements, such as missing forms or documents, unclear instructions from the client, or areas where SayPro’s proposal may have deviated from the submission guidelines.)

C. Client Relationship:

Client Expectations: (Discuss whether the proposal met the client’s expectations. Were there any misunderstandings about client needs or scope that could have been clarified early in the process?)
Engagement and Communication: (Evaluate the effectiveness of communication with the client throughout the submission process. Were there any delays, misunderstandings, or miscommunications that could be avoided in the future?)
Follow-up and Next Steps: (Document any follow-up actions required post-submission, such as additional clarifications, negotiations, or meetings to discuss feedback or project details.)

Process Improvements: (Provide actionable recommendations to improve the submission process for future proposals. These could include better planning, earlier involvement of key stakeholders, clearer deadlines, or enhanced quality control measures.)
Proposal Content Enhancements: (Recommend ways to enhance future proposal content. This might involve adding more detailed case studies, emphasizing specific capabilities, addressing feedback concerns, or refining the value proposition.)
Compliance Checks: (Propose changes to ensure stricter compliance with all submission requirements, including double-checking for completeness, accuracy, and alignment with client needs.)
Client Engagement Strategies: (Suggest strategies to improve client engagement and relationship management during the proposal process, such as pre-submission discussions or regular updates.)

Overall Assessment of Submission: (Provide a final summary of the overall submission process, highlighting key successes and areas for improvement. This section should capture the essence of what worked and what did not.)
Action Plan for Improvement: (Outline an action plan based on the lessons learned and recommendations. Assign responsible individuals for each action and include timelines for implementing changes in future submissions.)

Comments