A standardized form for scoring bids based on predefined evaluation criteria
1. General Information
Item | Details |
---|---|
Procuring Entity | SayPro |
Department/Unit | [Insert Department] |
Contract Type | [e.g., Goods, Services, Works] |
Budget Estimate | [Insert Amount] |
Number of Bidders | [Insert Total] |
Bid Opening Date | [Insert Date] |
Evaluation Start Date | [Insert Date] |
Evaluation Completion Date | [Insert Date] |
2. Compliance Checklist (Preliminary Evaluation)
Evaluate if each bid meets the mandatory requirements. Use β for compliant, β for non-compliant.
Bidder Name | Bid Submission on Time | Valid Tax Clearance | Signed Declaration | Pricing Structure Attached | Compliance Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[Bidder 1 Name] | β / β | β / β | β / β | β / β | Compliant/Non |
[Bidder 2 Name] | β / β | β / β | β / β | β / β | Compliant/Non |
[etc.] |
Note: Only compliant bidders proceed to technical and financial evaluation.
3. Technical Evaluation
Evaluation Criteria | Weight (%) | Bidder 1 | Bidder 2 | Bidder 3 | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Understanding of the Terms of Reference | 20% | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Insert] |
Methodology & Approach | 20% | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Insert] |
Relevant Experience | 15% | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Insert] |
Qualifications of Team | 15% | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Insert] |
Capacity & Resources | 10% | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Insert] |
Quality Assurance Measures | 10% | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Insert] |
Innovation/Value Add | 10% | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Insert] |
Total Technical Score (%) = Sum of (Score Γ Weight) for each bidder.
4. Financial Evaluation
Only bidders that meet the minimum technical threshold (usually 70%) are considered.
Bidder Name | Bid Price (ZAR) | Score Based on Price Formula* | Ranking |
---|---|---|---|
[Bidder 1 Name] | [Insert] | [Insert] | [1st/2nd] |
[Bidder 2 Name] | [Insert] | [Insert] | [1st/2nd] |
*Formula: Lowest Price / Bidder Price Γ Weight (e.g., 30%)
5. Combined Technical and Financial Scores
Bidder Name | Technical Score (70%) | Financial Score (30%) | Total Weighted Score (%) | Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
[Bidder 1 Name] | [Insert] | [Insert] | [Insert] | [1st] |
[Bidder 2 Name] | [Insert] | [Insert] | [Insert] | [2nd] |
6. Recommendation
Recommended Bidder: [Insert Name]
Justification:
- Highest total score
- Complies with all requirements
- Demonstrated technical capacity and value
- Competitive pricing
Recommended Award Amount: ZAR [Insert Amount]
7. Evaluation Committee Sign-Off
Name | Position | Signature | Date |
---|---|---|---|
[Evaluator 1] | Evaluation Team Leader | [Insert] | |
[Evaluator 2] | SCM Practitioner | [Insert] | |
[Evaluator 3] | Technical Expert | [Insert] |
Leave a Reply