SayPro Bid Evaluation Template

SayPro is a Global Solutions Provider working with Individuals, Governments, Corporate Businesses, Municipalities, International Institutions. SayPro works across various Industries, Sectors providing wide range of solutions.

Email: info@saypro.online Call/WhatsApp: Use Chat Button πŸ‘‡

A standardized form for scoring bids based on predefined evaluation criteria

1. General Information

ItemDetails
Procuring EntitySayPro
Department/Unit[Insert Department]
Contract Type[e.g., Goods, Services, Works]
Budget Estimate[Insert Amount]
Number of Bidders[Insert Total]
Bid Opening Date[Insert Date]
Evaluation Start Date[Insert Date]
Evaluation Completion Date[Insert Date]

2. Compliance Checklist (Preliminary Evaluation)

Evaluate if each bid meets the mandatory requirements. Use βœ“ for compliant, βœ— for non-compliant.

Bidder NameBid Submission on TimeValid Tax ClearanceSigned DeclarationPricing Structure AttachedCompliance Status
[Bidder 1 Name]βœ“ / βœ—βœ“ / βœ—βœ“ / βœ—βœ“ / βœ—Compliant/Non
[Bidder 2 Name]βœ“ / βœ—βœ“ / βœ—βœ“ / βœ—βœ“ / βœ—Compliant/Non
[etc.]

Note: Only compliant bidders proceed to technical and financial evaluation.


3. Technical Evaluation

Evaluation CriteriaWeight (%)Bidder 1Bidder 2Bidder 3Comments
Understanding of the Terms of Reference20%[Score][Score][Score][Insert]
Methodology & Approach20%[Score][Score][Score][Insert]
Relevant Experience15%[Score][Score][Score][Insert]
Qualifications of Team15%[Score][Score][Score][Insert]
Capacity & Resources10%[Score][Score][Score][Insert]
Quality Assurance Measures10%[Score][Score][Score][Insert]
Innovation/Value Add10%[Score][Score][Score][Insert]

Total Technical Score (%) = Sum of (Score Γ— Weight) for each bidder.


4. Financial Evaluation

Only bidders that meet the minimum technical threshold (usually 70%) are considered.

Bidder NameBid Price (ZAR)Score Based on Price Formula*Ranking
[Bidder 1 Name][Insert][Insert][1st/2nd]
[Bidder 2 Name][Insert][Insert][1st/2nd]

*Formula: Lowest Price / Bidder Price Γ— Weight (e.g., 30%)


5. Combined Technical and Financial Scores

Bidder NameTechnical Score (70%)Financial Score (30%)Total Weighted Score (%)Rank
[Bidder 1 Name][Insert][Insert][Insert][1st]
[Bidder 2 Name][Insert][Insert][Insert][2nd]

6. Recommendation

Recommended Bidder: [Insert Name]
Justification:

  • Highest total score
  • Complies with all requirements
  • Demonstrated technical capacity and value
  • Competitive pricing

Recommended Award Amount: ZAR [Insert Amount]


7. Evaluation Committee Sign-Off

NamePositionSignatureDate
[Evaluator 1]Evaluation Team Leader[Insert]
[Evaluator 2]SCM Practitioner[Insert]
[Evaluator 3]Technical Expert[Insert]

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!