1. Purpose of Document Verification
The purpose of verifying submitted documents is to confirm that each vendor or bidder complies with SayPro’s procurement requirements, ensuring fairness, eligibility, and transparency. This process also helps mitigate procurement risks by evaluating the credibility, capacity, and compliance of each bidder.
2. Required Documentation Checklist
To be considered for evaluation, vendors were mandated to submit the following documents with their bids, quotations, or proposals:
2.1 Administrative and Legal Compliance
- Company Registration Certificate (e.g., CIPC)
- Tax Clearance Certificate or SARS PIN
- BBBEE Certificate or Sworn Affidavit
- Certified ID copies of directors/shareholders
- Signed SBD Forms (SBD 1, SBD 4, SBD 6.1, SBD 8, SBD 9)
- Declaration of Interest and Conflict of Interest forms
2.2 Financial Documentation
- Recent Annual Financial Statements (not older than 2 years)
- Bank Confirmation Letter (issued within last 3 months)
- Statement of Account showing financial standing (optional but encouraged)
2.3 Technical and Professional Capability
- Proof of Industry/Professional Accreditation (where applicable)
- Company Profile including organizational structure
- Detailed Methodology or Project Plan (for service-based projects)
- Curriculum Vitae of key personnel (for consulting engagements)
2.4 Experience and References
- At least three signed reference letters from past clients
- List of recent similar projects undertaken in the last 3 years
3. Document Verification Process
The verification process was conducted in three structured phases:
3.1 Initial Screening (Administrative Review)
Upon opening, all submissions were checked against a standardized Document Verification Checklist. Each bidder’s envelope or digital submission folder was cross-verified by the Procurement Officer and documented in the Bid Compliance Register.
- Outcome Tags:
- ✅ Complete Submission
- ⚠️ Incomplete – Pending Clarification
- ❌ Non-Compliant – Disqualified
3.2 Detailed Document Assessment
Procurement and Compliance Officers performed a deep-dive check into:
- Financial Statements – Reviewed for completeness, auditor signature, and reasonableness of reported figures.
- Reference Letters – Verified authenticity (contacted a random sample).
- Certifications – Checked for expiry dates and relevance to the bid.
- Methodology/Plans – Assessed against scope of work in the bid invitation.
3.3 Validation and Filing
- All verified documents were scanned, digitally archived, and linked to the specific Bid Reference Number.
- Any missing or questionable documents were flagged for clarification, and vendors were contacted within 48 hours where allowed by policy (limited to minor omissions, e.g., unsigned forms).
4. Summary of Findings (January 2025)
| Total Submissions | Complete Submissions | Incomplete (Clarified) | Non-Compliant (Disqualified) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 30 | 7 | 5 |
Most Common Document Issues Identified:
- Missing or expired Tax Clearance Certificates
- Incomplete SBD 4 and 8 Forms
- Lack of relevant financial documentation
- Outdated or generic reference letters
- Submissions without professional certifications (where required)
5. Document Audit Trail & Records Management
To ensure accountability:
- A Document Verification Log was maintained for each submission.
- All documents were uploaded to SayPro’s Procurement Document Management System (PDMS).
- Access to records is restricted to the Procurement Committee, SCM compliance auditors, and internal finance controls.
6. Communication with Bidders
All vendors were issued formal confirmation letters noting:
- Successful document compliance, or
- Identified deficiencies and resulting disqualification (where applicable).
Clarification notices were issued between 2–4 February 2025 to allow minor rectifications under the prescribed SCM policy.
Conclusion
The thorough document verification process implemented for January’s Tender and Bid Collection under SCMR-1 ensured that only compliant, well-documented, and eligible submissions advanced to the evaluation stage. This approach reinforces SayPro’s commitment to professional, ethical, and efficient procurement practices.
Leave a Reply