SayPro Bid Evaluation Template

SayPro is a Global Solutions Provider working with Individuals, Governments, Corporate Businesses, Municipalities, International Institutions. SayPro works across various Industries, Sectors providing wide range of solutions.

Email: info@saypro.online Call/WhatsApp: Use Chat Button 👇

A standardized template for evaluating bids, allowing for easy comparison of technical and financial elements

Bid Evaluation Template Structure:

  1. Header Section:
    • Project Name:
      Enter the title of the project or procurement for which the bids are being evaluated.
    • Bid Evaluation Committee:
      List the members of the committee responsible for evaluating the bids.
    • Evaluation Date:
      Enter the date when the bid evaluation process is being conducted.
    • RFP Reference Number:
      Specify the reference number of the RFP being evaluated.
    • Bidder Names:
      List all the bidders who have submitted proposals for this project.

  1. Evaluation Criteria Overview:
    • A clear list of the evaluation criteria based on the RFP’s requirements, including both Technical and Financial aspects.
    Example Criteria:
    • Technical Evaluation Criteria:
      • Compliance with technical requirements
      • Quality of proposed solutions
      • Innovation and value-added features
      • Experience and qualifications of the team
      • Project timeline
      • Sustainability practices
    • Financial Evaluation Criteria:
      • Price (Total bid price, including any optional costs)
      • Payment terms
      • Discount structures
      • Cost breakdown (labor, materials, services)
      • Any additional fees or hidden costs
    Weightings: Assign relative weights to each criterion. For example:
    • Technical Evaluation: 60%
    • Financial Evaluation: 40%

  1. Technical Evaluation Section: This section is used to assess the technical aspects of each bidder’s submission. Each technical criterion should be scored based on how well the bidder meets the RFP requirements. CriteriaDescriptionBidder A ScoreBidder B ScoreBidder C ScoreCompliance with Technical RequirementsEvaluate if the proposal meets all the technical requirements outlined in the RFP.9/107/108/10Quality of Proposed SolutionsAssess the overall quality of the technical solution provided.8/108/109/10Innovation & Value-Added FeaturesAssess if the bidder offers any innovative or additional features that enhance the project.7/109/108/10Experience and QualificationsReview the qualifications and past experience of the bidder’s team and organization.9/107/108/10Project TimelineAssess whether the proposed timeline meets project requirements.8/107/109/10Sustainability PracticesEvaluate the environmental and sustainability practices incorporated into the project.7/106/109/10 Total Technical Score:
    (Sum of each technical score weighted according to its importance)

  1. Financial Evaluation Section: This section is used to assess the financial aspects of each bidder’s proposal, ensuring that the financial terms are competitive and within budget. CriteriaDescriptionBidder A PriceBidder B PriceBidder C PriceTotal Bid PriceThe total cost of the project, including all expenses.$500,000$520,000$480,000Payment TermsEvaluate the payment schedule proposed by the bidder.30% upfront, 40% milestone, 30% on completion20% upfront, 30% milestone, 50% on completion25% upfront, 50% milestone, 25% on completionDiscount StructureConsider any discounts offered for early payment or bulk procurement.No discount5% discount for early payment3% discount for early paymentCost BreakdownReview the detailed breakdown of costs (e.g., labor, materials, equipment).See attachedSee attachedSee attachedAdditional FeesIdentify any additional hidden fees, maintenance costs, or post-project charges.None$10,000 for aftercare$5,000 for aftercare Total Financial Score:
    (Total financial evaluation score based on bidder price competitiveness, payment terms, and other factors)

  1. Overall Evaluation: In this section, the Technical and Financial scores are combined to provide an overall evaluation of each bidder. A weighted average can be used to combine the scores from the two categories. BidderTechnical ScoreFinancial ScoreTotal ScoreRankBidder A85%90%87.5%2ndBidder B80%85%82.5%3rdBidder C88%92%90%1st Final Recommendation:
    Based on the overall score, Bidder C is the recommended bidder for the project due to their highest total score.

  1. Additional Comments & Observations: In this section, the evaluators can provide any additional notes or observations about the bidders’ proposals. This could include any risks, challenges, or clarifications required before proceeding to contract negotiation.

Conclusion and Next Steps:

  • Approval:
    The evaluation committee will submit the final evaluation report for approval from the designated authority.
  • Negotiation Phase:
    Based on the final recommendation, the procurement team will enter the negotiation phase with the selected bidder.
  • Contract Award:
    After successful negotiations, the contract will be awarded to the selected bidder.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!